Commander rankings

Every playgroup has the argument: which deck is actually the best at the table? Manatable settles it with data. Its commander tier list ranks every commander your table has played by a confidence-adjusted win rate, rather than a raw percentage that a single lucky game can distort.

A win rate that accounts for small sample sizes

Raw win rate is misleading when a commander has only played twice. Manatable's ranking shrinks win rates toward the table average the fewer games a commander has, and any commander with fewer than 3 games is flagged provisional, so a short win streak doesn't jump to the top of the chart before it is earned.

Art, medals, and rank

Each commander in the ranking gets its art-crop image and a medal rank, so the tier list reads like a leaderboard rather than a spreadsheet. It is easy to scan and easy to screenshot into the group chat when someone needs proof.

Head-to-head record

Beyond the tier list, Manatable builds a head-to-head rivalry matrix: wins and losses between every pair of players in the pod, based on games played. It answers "have I actually ever beaten you" without anyone having to remember.

Built on the same game history

Rankings are only as good as the games behind them. Every result feeds in from stats and history, which holds per-table game history, the leaderboard, and admin-editable results.